本站首页 返回顶部 关于博主

1997 Flores Settlement Agreement

PDF版

The AILA issued a press release saying that the rules should “denounce the Flores Settlement Agreement, a decades-old judicial regulation that has been put in place to ensure the safety and proper care of children in pre-trial detention. The Flores scheme also provides for the NSIS to apply a directive that promotes the release of a parent, legal guardian, related adult or licensed program. After the incarceration of a minor, the INS or the licensed program must immediately and continuously undertake and record family reunification and release efforts and maintain updated records of minors kept for more than 72 hours, including biographical information and hearing data. That`s the situation. What they are doing is a reference to a judicial transaction called the Flores decision, which took place in 1997. I am very familiar with it because I signed it. And it was a comparison of a long-standing dispute that said that children were being held in as unrestricted a setting as possible and for the shortest possible time in order to be accommodated either by a family member or by another custody situation. Flores and other minors in police custody sometimes had to share dormitories and bathrooms with unrelated adult men and women. Flores was regularly touched and told that she could only be released for her parents, not her aunt. In its complaint, the ACLU asserted that Flores and other unaccompanied children had a constitutional right to be released from “responsible” adults, as demonstrated by the Marquette Law Review in a review of the history of the Flores Colony. The Flores Colony has also set minimum standards for licensed programs and has established that these facilities must comply with all applicable government child protection laws and regulations, as well as all national and local rules on construction, fire, health and safety. The resolution of the family separation crisis on the U.S.-Mexico border, the Trump administration has decided, is to get rid of a 1997 federal court ruling that strictly limits the government`s ability to keep children in custody.

However, it is a judgment of the administration on how to implement this court decision. And this implementation of the court`s decision, which says that children must be separated from their parents because their parents are being sued – which has never been the case in the past since the agreement by other administrations – both democratic and republican administrations. In the end, the Ninth Circle decided that the Flores colony not only included unaccompanied extraterrestrial children, but was also “accompanied.” It established a general standard that the government could not detain her for more than 20 days. The U.S. government and the Center for Human Rights and human rights law (CHRCL) reached the Flores agreement in 1997, after lawyers filed a class action against the United States in 1985.